Nous suivre :



Dossiers :
 
Articles :

On découvre dans le New York Times d’hier que l’Iran approvisionne l’armée syrienne de Bachar el Assad par voie aérienne depuis le début de l’année. Il y aurait eu une pause en mars, et depuis juillet le pont aérien qui survole l’Irak a été rétabli, avec la complicité des autorités irakiennes.

On avait déjà des indications de ce que l’Iran fournit des renforts aux troupes assadistes, en « gardiens de la révolution ». Officiellement, ceux capturés par l’Armée syrienne de libération seraient des touristes ou des « pèlerins »... On apprend là que le soutien iranien est bien plus massif encore, et consiste principalement à fournir armes et munitions à la dictature syrienne qui en use beaucoup depuis plus d’un an et demi de guerre contre son peuple.

Cet approvisionnement passe par les airs pour esquiver le risque de tomber entre les mains des révolutionnaires qui contrôlent une bonne part des voies d’accès terrestres. Or, pour le moment, Assad tient les aéroports, en dépit de récentes attaques de l’opposition sur certains d’entre eux.

Ainsi la nécessité d’une zone d’exclusion aérienne, que la communauté internationale – en l’occurrence, la France, les États-Unis et la Grande-Bretagne –, refuse d’imposer dans le ciel syrien, aurait non seulement l’effet d’interdire les bombardements de population civile auxquels le dictateur syrien recourt massivement depuis cet été, mais d’empêcher cette internationalisation du conflit en cours depuis bien longtemps sans qu’on en ait été avisé jusqu’à cette information publiée ce début septembre.

Est expliqué simultanément que l’Iran procède à l’organisation de milices destinées à pourrir la situation sur le modèle irakien en cas de victoire de l’opposition…

La politique de non-ingérence occidentale est ainsi décalquée sur celle qui a prévalu pendant la guerre d’Espagne. Sauf qu’à l’époque le gouvernement de Léon Blum avait mis en place de l’aide clandestine, bien insuffisante mais réelle, au bénéfice de la République espagnole, dont il n’y a pas d’équivalent ici. On aura été abondamment intoxiqués par le mythe d’approvisionnement de l’opposition syrienne par le Qatar et l’Arabie séoudite, mais celui-ci se dégonfle comme une baudruche à mesure que les reportages relatent comment les insurgés ne sont équipés que de mitraillettes kalashnikovs, et parfois d’équipements plus lourds, tous d’origine russe, repris sur les troupes gouvernementales.

Ainsi l’abandon de la Syrie est total. Jour après jour les bombardements d’Alep s’intensifient, et il faut un héroïsme sans bornes au peuple syrien pour résister pied à pied sous le tapis de bombes…

Cette information très tardive du New York Times reste à décrypter. Pourquoi révéler aujourd’hui ce qu’on cache depuis des mois ? Serait-ce une indication d’une intention d’intervenir ? Manifestement, non. Washington fait simplement mine de s’inquiéter de la complicité irakienne, mais ceci ne fait que confirmer que le nouveau régime irakien est bien plus indépendant qu’on ne le suppose d’ordinaire.

Que faudrait-il faire ? Interpeler nos gouvernants qui aujourd’hui organisent cyniquement le maintien de cette dictature en se camouflant derrière des déclarations vertueuses. Barack Obama et François Hollande se sont coulés dans les rôles de Chamberlain et Daladier qui laissaient intervenir l’Allemagne nazie et l’Italie fasciste aux côtés de l’armée de Franco pour écraser le peuple espagnol.

Relevons encore une fois que la palme de l’hypocrisie revient à la France, qui se prétend solidaire de l’opposition, mais n’aura pas bougé un petit doigt, ni même pour recevoir la centaine de réfugiés arrivés cet été à Paris...

Paris s’éveille

Iran Supplying Syrian Military via Iraqi Airspace

September 4, 2012

WASHINGTON — Iran has resumed shipping military equipment to Syria over Iraqi airspace in a new effort to bolster the embattled government of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, according to senior American officials.

The Obama administration pressed Iraq to shut down the air corridor that Iran had been using earlier this year, raising the issue with Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq. But as Syrian rebels gained ground and Mr. Assad’s government was rocked by a bombing that killed several high officials, Iran doubled down in supporting the Syrian leader. The flights started up again in July and, to the frustration of American officials, have continued ever since.

Military experts say that the flights have enabled Iran to provide supplies to the Syrian government despite the efforts Syrian rebels have made to seize several border crossings where Iranian aid has been trucked in.

“The Iranians have no problems in the air, and the Syrian regime still controls the airport,” said a retired Lebanese Army general, Hisham Jaber, who heads the Middle East Center for Studies and Research in Beirut.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who has played the lead role on Iraq policy for the Obama administration, discussed the Syrian crisis in a phone call with Mr. Maliki on Aug. 17. The White House has declined to disclose details, but an American official who would not speak on the record said that Mr. Biden had registered his concerns over the flights.

The Iranian flights present searching questions for the United States. The Obama administration has been reluctant to provide arms to the Syrian rebels or establish a no-fly zone over Syria for fear of being drawn deeper into the Syrian conflict. But the aid provided by Iran underscores the reality that Iran has no such hesitancy in providing military supplies and advisers to keep Mr. Assad’s government in power.

And Mr. Maliki’s tolerance of Iran’s use of Iraqi airspace suggests the limits of the Obama administration’s influence in Iraq, despite the American role in toppling Saddam Hussein and ushering in a new government. The American influence also appears limited despite its assertion that it is building a strategic partnership with the Iraqis.

Mr. Maliki has sought to maintain relations with Iran, while the United States has led the international effort to impose sanctions on the Tehran government. At the same time, the Iraqi prime minister appears to look at the potential fall of Mr. Assad as a development that might strengthen his Sunni Arab and Kurdish rivals in the region. Some states that are the most eager to see Mr. Assad go, like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, have poor relations with Mr. Maliki and his Shiite-dominated government.

Iraq could take several steps to stop the flights, including insisting that cargo planes that depart from Iran en route to Syria land for inspection in Baghdad or declaring outright that Iraq’s airspace cannot be used for the flights.

Iraq does not have a functioning air force, and since the withdrawal of American forces last December, the United States has no planes stationed in the country. Several airlines have been involved in ferrying the arms, according to American officials, including Mahan Air, a commercial Iranian airline that the United States Treasury Department said last year had ferried men, supplies and money for Iran’s paramilitary Quds Force and Hezbollah, the militant Lebanese group backed by Iran.

One former American official said it was not entirely clear what cargo was being sent to Syria before the flights stopped in March. But because of the type of planes involved, the nature of the carriers and the Iranians’ reluctance to have the planes inspected in Iraq, it was presumed to be tactical military equipment.

At the time the flights were suspended, Iraq was preparing to host the Arab League summit meeting, which brought to Baghdad many leaders opposed to Mr. Assad. Immediately after the meeting, President Obama, in an April 3 call to Mr. Maliki, reinforced the message that the flights should not continue.

As part of Iran’s assistance to the Assad government, it has provided the Syrian authorities with the training and technology to intercept communications and monitor the Internet, according to American officials. Iranian Quds Force personnel, they say, have been involved in training the heavily Alawite paramilitary forces the government has increasingly relied on, as well as Syrian forces that secure the nation’s air bases.

The Iranians have even provided a cargo plane that the Syrian military can use to ferry men and supplies around the country, according to two American officials.

In a new twist, according to one American official, there have been reliable reports that Iraqi Shiite militia fighters, long backed by Iran during its efforts to shape events inside Iraq, are now making their way to Syria to help the Assad government.

While they have not specifically discussed the assistance it is airlifting to Syria, American officials have spoken publicly about Iran’s involvement there. “Iran is playing a larger role in Syria in many ways,” Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said last month. “There’s now an indication that they’re trying to develop, or trying to train, a militia within Syria to fight on behalf of the regime.”

David Cohen, a senior Treasury Department official on terrorism issues, said last month that Hezbollah has been training Syrian government personnel and has facilitated the training of Syrian forces by Iran’s Quds Force.

In his comments last month, Mr. Panetta insisted that the Iranian efforts would merely “bolster a regime that we think ultimately is going to come down.” But some Iranian experts believe that the Iranian leadership may be unlikely to stop its involvement in Syria even if Mr. Assad is overthrown, having calculated that a chaotic Syria is better than a new government that might be sympathetic to the West.

“Plan A is to keep Bashar al-Assad in power,” said Mohsen Sazegara, an Iranian pro-democracy activist who lives in the United States and who was one of the founding members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. “But Plan B is that if they can’t keep him in power anymore they will try to make another Iraq or another Afghanistan — civil war — then you can create another Hezbollah.”

As vocal as the Pentagon and the State Department have been about the Iranian role, they have been loath to publicly discuss the Iranian flights or the touchy questions it poses about American relations with the Maliki government. The State Department, when asked Tuesday about the Iranian flights over Iraq and what efforts the United States had made in Baghdad to encourage the Iraqi government to stop them, would not provide an official comment.

[Source : New York Times]